To the City of Los Angeles – Zoning Administration

On Saturday Night Live, there was a recurring segment called “Really?”. Whenever the writers hear of an issue that strikes them as outrageous or dumbfounding, they use this segment to give it the satirical roasting it deserves.

I wish I could hire the writers of that show to give me better words for this occasion, but I will have to settle for “Really?”

What is this occasion? Eagle Rock has to go in front of the Zoning Administration to defend itself as part of the Conditional User Permit it was granted. And if they pass this test, they get to do it again in 3 1/2 years. Before Eagle Rock is questioned tomorrow, here are my questions for the City of Los Angeles….

You are actually thinking about stopping a growing business that has actually hired people in this economy and possibly force them to move. Really?

You would rather a building sit empty than have people inside buying products that are taxed knowing that those dollars then go to the City of Los Angeles? Really?

You want to make the City of the Angels MORE unapealing to entrepreneurs who would like to be opening breweries? Do you know something that Portland, Oregon, Asheville, North Carolina, San Diego, California, Seattle, Washington and New York City, NY don’t know? Really?

You desire to antagonize the small but tight knit craft beer community? A community that has propelled economic growth in a down economy? Really?

Eagle Rock Brewing is an asset not only inside city limits but across the country because they not only employ and serve our local citizens, but also represent Los Angeles at national events – like when they brought home a gold medal from the Great American Beer Festival in Denver.

This is a law abiding, tax paying, community building small business who needs your support. Really.

Los Angeles Craft Beer timeline

Saw this on the Craft Beer Chronicles and thought it should get another audience after bouncing around Facebook and Twitter last week.


These two timelines really show how young we are as a craft beer community. I sometimes feel impatient with the growth of breweries and bottle shops here in LA but I have to stop comparing to Portland and Denver and see that that most of the places that I frequent aren’t even 5 years old. We have to walk before we can run. And here is what I think we will need in the future to really make LA a beer destination.

1. More breweries. We are on the path and if the City of Los Angeles would just get the hell out of the way we could have a bumper crop in a couple years. A community of brewers will only create higher standards and more experimentation.
2. A couple specialty beer bars. We need a real ale establishment or a sour beer house or heck even a bar that serves out of town beers to all the LA people who came from someplace else. Maybe a movie house with taps like the Alamo Drafthouse.
3. More media coverage. I’m looking at you LA Times and KCRW’s Good Food.
4. A lot more summer beers. LA gets hot if you didn’t notice over the 4th of July weekend. We can’t be drinking high ABV Triple IPA’s and Barrel aged stouts. We need light session beers and pilsners and we need more of them in cans so the active set can take them to where they want to go.

Silipint

from the Silipint website

I heard about the Silipint on Beer O’Clock and I thought. How many pint glasses have I broken that this would be such a need? I am clumsy at times but nothing has even chipped in the last two years.

But just because I don’t go to the beach or hike or other places where these would come in handy. Doesn’t mean others don’t.

If you have tried the Silipint, let me know your experience.

Purpose Energy

Using your beer to make energy for your next beer. That is the basic conceit behind Purpose Energy.

Check out their website and see what they did at Magic Hat. I can see some of the regional and super-regional breweries taking a good hard look at this idea.

Session # 53


“One thing about drinking a lot of beer is that occasionally you’re going to have a bad one. Perhaps it was infected or spoiled by light. Perhaps the brewer or brewery was new and still working out the kinks on a particular style. Regardless, you couldn’t finish the beer in your glass and moved onto the next one.

The Session #53: Beer Redemption

In July 2011, the Beer Briefing is proud to host The Session , a collection of beer bloggers and writers focusing on a single topic.

With the above in mind, my topic this month is Beer Redemption.

Early on in my beer drinking days a friend signed me up for a “Beer of the Month Club” as a gift. Once a month a brown cardboard box would show up on the stoop of my college apartment in New Jersey. Inside would be 12 bottles, of microbrews from around the country. Labels of color and whimsy that were foreign to my eyes with styles I had not yet discovered or knew much about.

The one thing I remember was that they were all terrible.

I would choke down brown ales and barley wines, suffer through IPAs and oatmeal stouts. For six months this box of dread would show up and I would dutifully drink down each bottle. I assumed at the time that my palate was not yet sophisticated enough to understand the different varieties of hops or malt. But, I was determined to learn so I suffered through.

Looking back now, I realize that these beers were likely out of season, past the recommended sell date and had been sitting in a hot, dusty warehouse waiting to be shipped to saps like me.

Unfortunately, the one brand that stuck out in my mind in the decade since the first package was opened was Smuttynose Brewing Co. The drawing of a harbor seal on top of each cap was seared in my mind, and like Pavlov’s Dog each time I would see a beer from that New Hampshire brewery on a shelf or on tap, I would pass it over for another beer.

My rationale was: with all these great American craft beers available on the market (to say nothing of the wonderful brews made ’round the world) why should I give this brewery – the one that sent crappy beer to my door – any of my money or my time where there were deserving brews along side them.

Of course, you know how this ends. The Session does contain the word “redemption” after all.

Good dog. Good Beer.

It would be almost nine years before I would have another Smuttynose. I was in New Hampshire at a graduation party and it was towards the end of the night. The beer I had been drinking was long gone and all that remained were cans of industrial American lager and some bottles of Old Brown Dog Ale from Smuttynose.

I actually sighed as a popped the cap and in the moments after I took the swig from the bottle (no glasses at this particular party) the rish malt character hit me. Then, the hops made an appearance and everything was working in harmony. I pulled the bottle away and looked at it suspiciously. Yup, it was the same Smuttynose, the same label. Same harbor seal on the cap.

In that moment I realized the foolishness of youth and how many earlier chances I passed up to properly taste this beer. These days it is not uncommon to find Smuttynose of various styles in my refridgerator. I haven’t actually visited the brewery yet, but they are now high on my list.

So, what has been your beer redemption? “

When I read the topic, first I daydreamed of Russian River Brewery then I wished I had a great story for a great topic.

Alas, I do not. I have racked my feeble memory banks. Checked my RateBeer account for any hints. Even gazed upon my bottlecap collection for a flash of brilliance. I could not locate a beer or brewery that I had written off and then re-found. Nothing.

Then at the recent Stone Brewing SourFest, I overheard someone at a table say that he (loosely quoted), “Did not like much that was made by Craftsman”, a brewery based in Pasadena, California. And here is where the redemption kicks in. The rest of the table began a mini-discussion of the merits of the brewery. A flippant remark was challenged. And though the person who made the comment might still wholeheartedly believe it, he now had heard the other side of the story. And the next time a Craftsman beer is on a list, he might actually choose it.

That is where most redemptions probably come from. You wouldn’t go seeking out poorly rated beers. But if it was the last craft at someone’s party, or if a friend tells you to get off your high horse, that is when magic happens. It proves once again that it is a beer community, not just one solitary craft beer dictator.

Then the Oprah light bulb lit up and I realized that if one beer was bad for me, it shouldn’t sour (pun intended) the rest of a brewery’s line-up. I should pay attention to the friendly craft beer community and not get stuck in a rut. I still may not order that particular offering for a long while but I should (from now on) not hesitate to sip another from that brewer.

Later in the day after that discussion, I procured a sample of the Craftsman Extreme Braggot. It tasted like buttered popcorn. But I don’t think I will stop trying what they brew. How else can it be redeemed if I don’t.

The Firkin for June 2011

There seems to be a lingering resentment of beer bloggers by some of the “old guard” of beer writers and I do not know why.

Let me back-track, just as the 1st Beer Bloggers convention was getting underway in Boulder last year, Andy Crouch asked “to what end” in relation to beer blogging. Where he made some good arguments but as the title suggests did not know WHY people would blog about the world of beer. In my mind, I heard Woody Allen complaining about kids today and their “technology”

Then this month two separate items caught my eye that again seemed to again reinforce a negative vibe.

First, Tim Webb in his BeerAdvocate column in Issue # 52 proclaimed boldly in the first paragraph about an article on gypsy/roving brewers “do not blog”. Whether tongue in cheek, it sent the wrong message to me and colored for the worse, the rest of the column. Especially at the end when he basically said gypsy brewers would ALL eventually have their own breweries. So I chalked it up to either crass overgeneralizations on two separate counts or someone looking to pick a little verbal fight.

Then I read on the Pencil & Spoon that the chairman of CAMRA slyly dug into the “blogeratti” as well. Again, I tried to reason that maybe he was like a republican trying to say what the Tea Party wanted to hear. Please the rabble rousers type of language.

But I get the strange feeling that their are certain people in the craft beer world who are unwilling to jump into beer in the year 2011 with both feet. I should know. I eschewed Twitter for a long time and rather proudly. But denigrating keg beer for cask as CAMRA seems to do frequently or taking potshots at bloggers from your perch as a beer book author or magazine writer seems one of those desperate hold the Alamo ploys. I know that I cannot snark Twitter out of existence but I can come to a negotiated peace with 140 characters. But some people, I fear, think they can stop the computerized tide with verbal potshots.

I have come to realize that ANYONE involved in craft beer that tells you that blogging is useless or trivial or filled with bad writing is flat out wrong. Are some blogs useless, trivial and filled with bad writing? Yes. And there are days when this very blog harvest all three. But blogs as well as Twitter and Facebook are simply not magazines or books or organizations. They are transient bursts of information that convey instant moods and feelings but that also sometimes transcend the now and become fully formed snapshots. I firmly believe that art can be made from Polaroids as well as paintbrushes.

To the doubters, I say, I do not want to go back to one style of beer. And I don’t want to go back to one vehicle for conveying beer information.

All of us share a mission. To share our love of craft beer. Let’s all work to that end with our varied talents, shall we?

California Growler Challenge – June Update

Here is what has happened in the first half of the year. It may not seem like much, but considering that I am brand new at this and I can’t devote loads of time to it, the progress ain’t half bad.

-started an electronic petition
-got a Facebook page up and running
-created a letter to your representative template
-raised awareness

Now it is time to try to get some bigger guns in the fray. So here is where YOU come in (yet again). If you know anybody in the following areas: recycling, California tourism, beverage container manufacturers or a politician, start telling them about the “Brewed in California” growler idea. Ask for their feedback. See if the idea has a fatal flaw or needs to be tweaked. AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, sign them up and get them involved. If we can get a coalition of people and groups and businesses, we stand a better chance of succeeding.

I am going to start by reaching out to the Container Recycling Institute and see what she thinks of the California growler.

And to make the conversation clear, here is what I perceive as the need.
To change current law so that any participating brewery can sell a “Brewed in California” growler alongside their own branded growler. This growler could be legally filled by any participating brewery in the State of California as long as the beer information is attached to the growler via a sticker or other means.

and the why?
Two reasons. To create craft beer tourism options for the State of California while also creating an incentive to re-use one container repeatedly thus helping the recycling cause.

And if you haven’t written your state representatives, then do so! It can be done online! Let them know you care.

beer at 30,000 feet

The next time you are on a plane. Don’t judge that craft beer to harshly. It might just have been the wrong craft beer to have on a flight. Check out this (admittedly old) L.A. Times story

So when you are past security and shopping in an airport that is smart enough to sell local beer. (Thanks Laurelwood at PDX.) Make sure you get a big hop bomb.

That’s just my opinion. What style do YOU think would work best in the airplane environment?

Why we buy what we buy

I heard this story on NPR a couple weeks back and wondered, what if they took me to the beer aisle and strapped this…

…on me.

Would I ignore pricing? What colors would attract my eye. Just something to think about the next time you are perusing the craft beer choices.

Watching out for the small guy

I am not usually to inclined to the power of positive thinking when the government is involved. They have the habit of nosing into business that they should stay away from and shying away from protecting people from bigger interests with bigger pockets.

But this press release might be a cause for some hope in the craft beer world….

“The Brewers Association (BA) shared the news today that the Senate Small Brewers Caucus has been established. The formation of the Caucus was led by Senators Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), who support the role of America’s small and independent brewers as an engine of economic growth in the country.

In a Dear Colleague letter, Senators Baucus and Crapo noted, “In recent years, the more than 1,700 craft brewers all across America have met growing consumer demand for their products by brewing flavorful and innovative beers which they encourage Americans to enjoy in a responsible manner. These small and independent brewers…generate more than $3 billion in wages and benefits, and pay more than $2.3 billion in business, personal and consumption taxes.”

Mirroring the House Small Brewers Caucus, formed in 2007, the Senate Small Brewers Caucus provides a forum for members of the Senate and their staffs to discuss the issues important to small brewers while exploring what lawmakers can do to strengthen the growth and role of these small businesses in local economies across the country.

The caucus will also provide opportunities for Senators and staff to learn about the science and art of brewing beer, and the unique cultural and economic contributions made by small brewers to their communities.

Currently, the 1,700+ small American breweries account for about five percent of all the beer enjoyed in the United States and 50 percent of brewery jobs—-totaling some 100,000 good-paying part- and full-time positions across the country.

“Montana’s small brewers don’t just make great beer out of the best Montana grains—-they also support good-paying Montana jobs,” said Senator Baucus. “I’m so proud to create the bipartisan Senate Small Brewers Caucus—-because as the state with the second highest number of craft brewers per capita in the country, Montana small brewers need a voice in Congress who’ll keep looking out for them.” Montana boasts a strong brewing community, which generates and pays taxes on approximately $20 million of revenue, according to the Montana Brewers Association.

“As a major producer of barley, wheat and hops, Idaho has a growing role in the craft brewing business,” Senator Crapo said. “While advocating for the excise tax relief bill, I’ve had the opportunity to meet with many of Idaho’s small craft brewers and heard firsthand from local entrepreneurs about the opportunities for economic growth and job creation that the industry can provide. This caucus will provide Senators with a better understanding of all aspects of small brewing and the positive impact it has on their communities.” Senator Crapo, along with Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.), introduced this session’s Senate bill S. 534, which would recalibrate excise taxes on America’s small brewers. Joining Senators Kerry and Crapo were 17 of their Senate colleagues who signed on as original co-sponsors.

“Small craft brewers are growing, creating jobs and contributing in small and big ways to the recovery of the American economy,” said Charlie Papazian, president, Brewers Association. “The bipartisan establishment of the Senate Small Brewers Caucus reflects the collaborative, grassroots community spirit in which the nation’s small brewers contribute to their local communities.”